Tag Archives: Holidays

What has lamb got to do with Australia day?

Another Australia Day, another Lambassador ad.

After a ten year stint, the irascible Sam Kekovich has been replaced by modern multi-cultural icon Lee Lin Chin. I’ll leave an analysis of the marketing implications of the swap to Gruen. Instead, I want to look at the central claim of these ads and ask why the heck eating lamb is supposed to be Australian. After all, it’s not as if they’re native to Australia. Although Australia Post seems confused on the issue as in 1938 in a series of stamps celebrating Australian native animals, the 5d stamp was of a Merino.

An ancient statue erected by prehistoric Australians to the lamb Gods.
An ancient statue erected by prehistoric Australians to the lamb Gods of old.
Credit: WikiWookie CC3.0

For better or worse (and often worse when you think of the environmental impact), sheep have changed Australia irrevocably. You have to wince through CEW Bean’s constant references to “the blacks”, but his 1910 book On the Wool Track offers an amazing glimpse into a land on the cusp of changing.1 Bean chases the slow disappearance of Old Australia in front of the steady roll out of Modern Australia; although his Modern Australia is basically our Old Australia and ours would be his Sci-fi Australia.
Natural. Totally natural.
Natural. Totally natural.
Credit: Tim J Keegan CC2.0
Although he doesn’t seem overly concerned about it, he reports on wide-spread ecological changes that had happened within the lifetimes of his interviewees: scrub being trampled into dust and pine forests taking its place, land turning so barren all the soil is blown away and deposited so high on abandoned shearing sheds you could drive a horse and buggy up onto the roof.

Not only that, but he reports on the men (and sorry, but it really is the men he reports on) that sheep made and broke. He talks about how boundary riders, a legendary figure to modern Australia, at the time of his writing, had only just replaced the “hatters”—slang for Australian shepherds. These men were apparently “almost wild” and “feared neither God nor man” (p. 53). But just as the sheep made those men, they discarded them. In quests for ever greater profits, great stretches of Australia were fenced off from dingos, removing the need for hatters. Wells were sunk and tanks erected in (often unsuccessful) attempts to drought proof the farms. Those who constructed these works brought civilisation with them, and left traces of it behind like a muddy footprint when they departed.

Herding them was a nightmare.
Herding them was a nightmare.
Credit: Yathin S Krishnappa CC3.0
In contrast with Australia Post’s ideas, the first sheep to Australia arrived with the first fleet, some 100 of them, from the Cape of Good Hope. For the first few years of the colony, the majority of sheep seemed primarily to be African and Indian breeds, slowly being interspersed with purchases from Europe. This seems to be about as multi-cultural as the Australian diet got until the 1950s.

It was the wide-scale introduction of the Spanish Merino that made the Australian sheep industry really come into its own and drove this expansion of “civilisation”. Although Governor Macarthur is often credited with the introduction of the Merino to Australia from South Africa, he didn’t import enough to have a great impact. Instead, credit needs to go to George Hall Peppin, who bought merinos from Germany and France to form on of the world’s most successful studs.

At this point, you may be wondering why, if the Merino is a Spanish breed, do all these sheep appear to be coming from anywhere but Spain? In essence, the history of the Merino is full of a surprising amount of subterfuge and espionage… For sheep.

One could almost say a wolf dressed as something it's not...
One could almost say a wolf dressed as something it’s not…
Credit: State Library of Victoria CC2.0
Up until the end of the 17th century, it was widely acknowledged that Spain produced the best wool in the world. Consequently, in spite of several flocks being given out as gift by the royal family (from which the Saxony sheep are descended), it was prohibited to export sheep from Spain. Like an upstart teenager, upon knowing they couldn’t have any, Britain immediately needed to have some. This involved smuggling sheep overland from Portugal through continental Europe, sending sheep back as spoils of the Napoleonic Wars, and even allegedly a sting operation involving the Spanish ambassador’s wife.

Nevertheless, after laying his hands on some fine quality merinos (and, controversially, possibly some other breeds) George Hall Peppin and his family set about breeding a finer class of sheep for Australia. They were astonishingly scientific in their approach, considering Mendel was only just doing his punnet squares at the same time, and a thorough theory of genetics wouldn’t be discovered for another forty-odd years. This exacting patience led to what many seem to believe is nearly the perfect sheep. Amazingly, one of the factors that was most important about the Peppin merino was that its wool was long and bulky, and so perfect for the mills of Europe. Consequently, the merino sheep is arguably the first industrial animal.

I've just spent about half an hour watching industrial era spinning machinery in action.

Which I suppose gives a nice sort of symmetry to this entry—it turns out we created the merino just as much as it created us.

(Assuming you’re reading this from Aus)

Academic Sources

Bean, CEW 1910, On the wool track, John Lane Company, New York.

Parsonson, I 2000 The Australian ark: A history of domesticated animals in Australia, CSIRO Publishing, Clayton.

Lee, T 2011, Wanganella and the merino aristocrats, Hardie Grant Books, Richmond.

Verhoeven, D 2006, Sheep and the Australian cinema, Melbourne University Press, Melborune.

  1. That’s a link to a beautifully preserved, scanned, full-length copy of the book. I haven’t made it the whole way through yet, but it’s definitely worth a read.

Just what is Boxing Day?

For those of you who have been reading the blog from the beginning (ie. two posts ago). You’ve hopefully realised that my aim is to link what is currently happening in the world back to its historical antecedents. So for this post I’m tackling a pressing issue: Just what the heck is Boxing Day?

Hint: These aren't the origins of Boxing Day.
Hint: These aren’t the origins of Boxing Day.
Credit: Reml DU CC2.0

If you’re hoping for a definitive answer on this, I’m afraid you’re going to be disappointed. The origins of this holiday appear to be lost in the mists of time, and as you can probably tell by the quality of my references, the academic establishment really doesn’t seem to consider this a pressing mystery to solve.

The first explanation is the one that I was most familiar with (ie. the one my mother told me): On Christmas, lords and ladies and the well-to-do exchanged gifts, as you would expect. On the day after Christmas they would then give presents to their various servants. A lovely gesture, but these gifts were presented in unwrapped boxes (hence the name) because it wouldn’t do for servants to get any ideas.

This explanation gets the broad ideas correct, but misses out on some of the details. Firstly, actual boxes weren’t given to anyone. Instead, “Christmas boxes” were boxes generally made from earthenware, with a slot on the top or side to pop in money. The oldest recorded use of “Christmas box”, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, was in 1611 in a French-English Dictionary. According to that dictionary Christmas boxes were used in France “by begging Fryers, and here by Butlers, prentices, etc.” So from here we can see that Boxing day wasn’t actually about giving gifts, but blatantly giving money right from the start. So please point this out to anyone who complains that people don’t put any thought into gifts “these days”. Also, if they keep complaining, threaten to give them an Egg Master next year. What hasn’t changed is that even in 1668, people were whinging about how much getting presents cost.

This has no right to exist.

The second key aspect my mother’s explanation hits on, is that the giving crossed social classes or in the blunt words of a nineteenth century writer: “Christmas boxes are given by superiors to inferiors” (p. 327) (Can you guess which the author considered himself?). However, the social norms around this are a little confusing. Money is given from higher to lower status individuals, but it’s not necessarily the servants of one’s house. Instead, it’s “to those who are supposed to have a vague claim upon the donor for services rendered… for which he has not directly paid them”. (“Christmas Box”, OED).

What the heck does that mean? The potential list of those to donate to are also quite confusing: “letter-carriers, policemen, lamp-lighters, scavengers, butchers’ and bakers’ boys, tradesmen’s carmen, etc.” (“Christmas Box”, OED). In essence, these are all people who may have done you (filthy-rich member of the upper-crust that you are) a service, but one which you haven’t necessarily paid them for.

Remember, it's not a bribe if it's a centuries-old tradition.
Remember, it’s not a bribe if it’s a centuries-old tradition.
Credit: Chris Potter CC2.0
So a lamp-lighter has kept London lit at night for you, a carman delivered your goods and a policeman kicked those dirty guttersnipes off your front doorstep—each one a crucial service for which you are thankful. It’s that wonderful old-school thinking of reciprocity that really warms the heart: You’ve slaved away all year on my manor house and I’ve given you some loose change. Equal.

The last thing I’d like to end with is not at all relevant to the main question, but something I found damn interesting. The original name of Boxing Day was the Feast of St Stephen. That means Good King Wenceslas is not actually a Christmas carol, but a Boxing Day carol. Which is fine by me, as that’s one more day to sing what is objectively the best carol ever. It also means, Good Ol’ Wendeslas was actually a bit of a tight arse and was basically giving that peasant leftovers. Then again, considering the level reciprocity shown on Boxing Day, maybe that’s just keeping with the tradition of things?

BEST. CAROL. EVER. I will brook no arguments.

Academic(ish) Sources

“ˈChristmas-box, n.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, December 2015. Web. 27 December 2015

Cotgrave, R 1611, A dictionarie of the French and English tongues, A. Islip, London (?).

Parley, P (psued.) 1838, Tales About Christmas, Thomas Tegg and Son, Oxford (?).

Pepys, S 1893, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, ed. Henry Wheatley, located at The diary of Samuel Pepys: daily entries from the 17th century London diary, www.pepysdiary.com accessed 28 December 2015.